Showing posts with label Mystery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mystery. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Wonders of the Brain

This presentation is my work on the magnificence of human brain or more specifically how left brain and right brain co-ordinate our functions and play a larger role in defining our personality,find out which careers would be suited for you depending on weather you are a left or a right brain person.

It was compiled from various sources in February 2009 as a part of the module, Getting comfortable with visual aids, as a requirement for the Competent Communicator award  from the prestigious Toastmasters International, USA.

Go Through this presentation and indulge in all the games/activities listed in this presentation.
Certain animations in this presentation might not work on the web so download it from slideshare and play it on power point.



Hope you enjoyed it, kindly post your valuable queries/comments. :)


Monday, July 27, 2009

Taj Mahal was a HINDU TEMPLE!!!


No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P.N.Oak, who believes the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says, the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu temple palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ).

In the course of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama,Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial .

The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers. For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried in such mansions.
Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says the term "Mahal " has never been used for a building in any Muslim countries
from Afghanisthan to Algeria . "The unusual explanation that the term Taj Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in atleast two respects.
Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani ," he writes.
Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a woman's
name to derive the remainder as the name for the building."Taj Mahal, he
claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva's Palace . Oak also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists . Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time corroborates the love story.

Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the city in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time.

Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies
that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple
rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj ! Mahal have remained sealed since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects
commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples .. Fearing political
backlash, Indira Gandhi's government tried to have Prof. Oak's book
withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the first edition dire consequences .
There is only one way to discredit or validate Oak's research.
The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate.

Do circulate this to all you know and let them know about this reality.....

References:



911 Mysteries-Truth or Reality


Truth is often stranger than fiction, what our eyes see and what is shown to us is far beyond the reality.
The September 11, 2001 attacks on twin towers are regarded as the biggest ever terrorist attack on any nation and they hold the status of Japan bombing the Pearl harbour or America dropping bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
But are the things really that simple or is there a hidden mystery which if proved true might blot the face of United States for times to come.
A variety of conspiracy theories question the mainstream account of the September 11 attacks in the US. These theories assert that the official report on the events is not sufficiently forthright, truthful. Critics allege that government of the United States might have done attacks themselves. The common suspected motives were the use of attacks as a pretext to justify overseas wars and facilitate increased military spending.
Many of the theories have been voiced by the members of the 9/11 truth movement.
They claim that collapse of World Trade Centre was as a result of controlled demolition and not due to plane striking.
1. The world trade centre was entirely made of steel and they were the strongest steel structures in the world. It was made to resist the impact of Boeing 747 plane with full fuel capacity. But, the plane that actually struck the tower was Boeing 767 with very little fuel which was consumed with the initial fireballs and following few minutes of fire. So it rules out the official story which states that fire caused by the collapse of 47 column steel core, 236 exterior columns and 1000’s of trusses at the same time
2. We can see smoke coming out of the building, smoke indicates that fires were not burning successfully and that rules out the possibility of fire causing the collapse. Fires have burned the steel buildings for as long as 20 hours and yet the cores of the buildings have remained standing. The world trade centre was hit by fire in 1975 which was much larger than this fires but still the tower remained standing.
3. Melting point of steel is 1500 C or higher but fire of WTC was not hotter than 650 C; steel stoves don’t melt even if they are used for months. Even if the outer columns fall on one another even then the outer columns should have remained standing.
4. Metal and concrete is hurled away from the building sideways; a 270 ton piece of steel was hurled 120 meters into the neighbouring building, which indicates explosion not implosion.
5. The towers fell than 10 seconds which is less than free fall speed but it is possible only if the top storeys did not face any obstruction from lower storeys. A building so tall should have fallen in at least 136 if it were in a natural way.
6. If we see the video then we hear the sound of explosion first and then the structure starts to fall but it should have been the other way.
7. World trade centre complex had 7 buildings, Two were the twin towers and 5 other smaller buildings but only 1, 2, 7 collapse not 3,4,5,6 despite the fact that they had equally strong fires.
8. All the concrete and the building material (100000 tons) were pulverized into a very fine dust. Phenomena that require an enormous amount of energy that could not be produced by gravitational alone, it was only possible through a series for internal explosions.
9. Many videos show people who have reported blasts in the buildings, the morning videos of 9/11 show the interior covered with dust which indicates that some sort of construction work was going which clearly indicate explosives being planted.
10. Now you may be curious to know why they got the towers destroyed themselves. WTC was given on a private lease in 2001 for the first time. A man named Larry Silverstein was its owner; he had invested 15 million dollars in that. The WTC was covered with asbestos to make it fire proof and asbestos was banned by U.S.A in 1980’s So it was required of him to get it removed, which would have coasted him over a billion dollars, so he choose to go this way as WTC’s were big money losers and through this way he got 7 billion dollars through insurance company 300 times of what he had invested.
This theory states that lease owner of WTC himself had caused the collapse.
There are other theories which state the President Bush was responsible for the same as he wanted to say Iraq and Afghanistan for their oil reserves and it will give them a reason to do so.
Whatever the reason might be the truth will never come out as the American Institutes are testing it and they would never want to blot their own country’s image and also their might be high government pressure. But even that cannot rule out sadness that over a thousand people who died that day left for their families.

References: